- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What should the USA have done after 11 September 2001?
Posted on 9/11/14 at 4:59 pm to bencoleman
Posted on 9/11/14 at 4:59 pm to bencoleman
quote:
He was an asset that strayed off the reservation.
Of course Saddam "had to go." I've always believed that.
But, if the COSTS of deposing him far exceed the benefits of deposing him, it's easy to make a persuasive argument that the US should NOT have invaded Iraq in order to depose Saddam.
Now, if we would have simply occupied the New Iraq for as long as it took to take a trillion dollars worth of their oil for our own gas tanks, then, YES, Saddam had to go.
1
Posted on 9/11/14 at 5:09 pm to Champagne
quote:
Now, if we would have simply occupied the New Iraq for as long as it took to take a trillion dollars worth of their oil for our own gas tanks, then, YES, Saddam had to go.
How much of their oil did we get? Oh right, Chinese and Russian oil countries got the contracts. And as for the Saudi royal family, they're a major source of funding for terrorism worldwide.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News