Started By
Message

re: OOC Scheduling SEC vs. Pac12 vs B1G

Posted on 9/9/14 at 4:25 pm to
Posted by VABuckeye
Naples, FL
Member since Dec 2007
35627 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 4:25 pm to
Texas A & M has finished ranked in the top 15 three times in the last 19 years. That isn't fairly consistently.

I agree with the other three. Interestingly a couple of those you mentioned are more than willing take on stronger OOC games (which you don't give a shite about).
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84373 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 4:26 pm to
A buckeye is whining about strength of schedule?
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171083 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

Texas A & M has finished ranked in the top 15 three times in the last 19 years. That isn't fairly consistently.


1/2 since joining the SEC ain't bad. 18th last year. my point is still valid.

quote:

more than willing take on stronger OOC games (which you don't give a shite about).


I meant I don't care if they play shitty OOC games. if they play tough OOC games, then of course their overall body of work in a season will be more impressive, but I don't think weak OOC games takes anything away from the strength of their schedule because of their conference games.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram