Started By
Message

re: So why wouldnt Rice be suspended for the new mandated 6 games?

Posted on 9/9/14 at 10:14 am to
Posted by craigbiggio
Member since Dec 2009
31805 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 10:14 am to
quote:

Unless he argued she attacked him, the video wasn't shocking at all.


Agreed, but the public reacted strongly and Roger was already in hot water for only suspending him for 2 games. So he had one of his patented knee-jerk reactions.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83988 posts
Posted on 9/9/14 at 10:17 am to
quote:

Agreed, but the public reacted strongly and Roger was already in hot water for only suspending him for 2 games. So he had one of his patented knee-jerk reactions.



I completely understand the move by the NFL and the Ravens. However, if I'm the head of the NFLPA, you have to be concerned with the NFL handing down a punishment, changing the rule, then retroactively enforcing a punishment that is more severe than the one already rendered AND the new rule.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram