Started By
Message

re: Are feminists defending Ray Rice for treating his fiancee as an equal?

Posted on 9/8/14 at 4:18 pm to
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58190 posts
Posted on 9/8/14 at 4:18 pm to
I'm pretty sure being physically abused isn't a sign of equality in any demographic.
This post was edited on 9/8/14 at 4:21 pm
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 9/8/14 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

I'm pretty sure being physically abused isn't a sign of equality.


Would the NFL, media, White House, etc be reacting the same way if Rice hit a man?

These are the same people telling us women can do just as good a job as men as firefighters, cops, and in battle. Which is it?
This post was edited on 9/8/14 at 4:25 pm
Posted by Patrick_Bateman
Member since Jan 2012
17823 posts
Posted on 9/8/14 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

I'm pretty sure being physically abused isn't a sign of equality in any demographic.
So you're saying the fallout would be the same if Rice had cold-cocked a man?. . .

It would not.
Posted by novabill
Crossville, TN
Member since Sep 2005
10454 posts
Posted on 9/8/14 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

I'm pretty sure being physically abused isn't a sign of equality in any demographic.


Would there be an outcry had he treated a man that way?

Face it, we all think he is scum because of the way he treated a woman. However, the women that cry for equality should not hold that same view. Why should a man be treated differently for hitting a man than he is for hitting a woman, that is not equality.

It shows a breakdown in their logic. Men and women are not the same. You know it, I know it and most sane people know it. The feminist know it, but they will not admit it.

crickets
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram