Started By
Message

re: Tim Fletcher's point this morning

Posted on 9/8/14 at 10:33 am to
Posted by EarthwormJim
Member since Dec 2005
10063 posts
Posted on 9/8/14 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Honestly, I'd like to see a 3rd and 6 conversion where we complete an 8 yard pass instead of going for the deep ball. However, I do understand that it may have been a gameplan thing playing matchups with our receivers against the SHSU corners. If they were locked up with no safety help, I can see why we'd go for it all.


So his completions to Diarse against Wisconsin.
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
62426 posts
Posted on 9/8/14 at 10:39 am to
quote:

So his completions to Diarse against Wisconsin


Yes, like the first one. The second completion to Diarse against Wisconsin hardly counts seeing as it was 3rd and 21 and we looked to be calling a play to get into field goal range, but Diarse had other ideas. Not a knock against Jennings on that play, just commenting.

Against SHSU, I was at the game and could see several times where receivers were coming open over the middle of the field but Jennings ignored them to throw the deep ball. Like I said before, if it was a game plan thing, just playing the matchups, I'm won't panic. But we will have some crucial third downs starting in a couple of weeks and we need to be able to convert.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram