Started By
Message

re: Greenland & Antarctic ice loss

Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:47 pm to
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27837 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:47 pm to
Before I click the link, does it say what percent of ice was lost? If not then I've already read the article and it omits too much to form an opinion.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51817 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:49 pm to
I'll answer those questions for you boys.

"we don't know the answer to any of that but what we made up fits our political agenda and sounds really cool so we'll go with that."

EDIT: we'll say that because most blokes aren't smart enough to realize that the earth has been warming and cooling for it's ENTIRE existence.
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 1:50 pm
Posted by Tigah in the ATL
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2005
27539 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:52 pm to
don't form an opinion then
Posted by GeeOH
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2013
13376 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:22 pm to
It talks about the "height" lost in certain areas, it doesn't show the larger growth of areas.

Understand, I didn't read the article yet, but the graph show areas of ice HEIGHT loss, even though, from what I can surmise, the areas of ice could have increased yet there still could be lost height in areas.



I sure do see a lot of light blue as well. So its decreasing in thickness (height) in some areas and increasing in others.

Does this article dispute the findings of the ice cap increasing in area (not necessarily height)
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 2:28 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram