- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Greenland & Antarctic ice loss
Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:47 pm to Tigah in the ATL
Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:47 pm to Tigah in the ATL
Before I click the link, does it say what percent of ice was lost? If not then I've already read the article and it omits too much to form an opinion.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:49 pm to C
I'll answer those questions for you boys.
"we don't know the answer to any of that but what we made up fits our political agenda and sounds really cool so we'll go with that."
EDIT: we'll say that because most blokes aren't smart enough to realize that the earth has been warming and cooling for it's ENTIRE existence.
"we don't know the answer to any of that but what we made up fits our political agenda and sounds really cool so we'll go with that."
EDIT: we'll say that because most blokes aren't smart enough to realize that the earth has been warming and cooling for it's ENTIRE existence.
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:22 pm to C
It talks about the "height" lost in certain areas, it doesn't show the larger growth of areas.
Understand, I didn't read the article yet, but the graph show areas of ice HEIGHT loss, even though, from what I can surmise, the areas of ice could have increased yet there still could be lost height in areas.
I sure do see a lot of light blue as well. So its decreasing in thickness (height) in some areas and increasing in others.
Does this article dispute the findings of the ice cap increasing in area (not necessarily height)
Understand, I didn't read the article yet, but the graph show areas of ice HEIGHT loss, even though, from what I can surmise, the areas of ice could have increased yet there still could be lost height in areas.
I sure do see a lot of light blue as well. So its decreasing in thickness (height) in some areas and increasing in others.
Does this article dispute the findings of the ice cap increasing in area (not necessarily height)
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 2:28 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News