- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DNC Responds to Paul's WSJ Article
Posted on 8/28/14 at 6:34 pm to deltaland
Posted on 8/28/14 at 6:34 pm to deltaland
quote:
A main different in Paul and Obama is Paul has better leadership capabilities and I fully trust him to be more successful with diplomacy....more like Reagan.
What's the basis for your opinion? Rand has no executive experience?
quote:
You can be non interventionist and still have a strong foreign policy. Obama just makes all of the wrong decisions..his foreign policy is atrocious.
ALL of the wrong decisions? Are you saying that Obama should have stayed in Iraq and attacked Syria and Iran?
1
Posted on 8/28/14 at 11:01 pm to trackfan
quote:
Are you saying that Obama should have stayed in Iraq and attacked Syria
No. We should have maintained a little stronger presence in Iraq since we were already there, but pulled most troops out.
We shouldn't have attacked Assad and Syria, but where we fricked up was aiding the rebels. That directly enabled ISIS to form and they got their hands on advanced military equipment.
Had we stayed out of that, like Rand would have, Assad likely would have kept it under control and ISIS wouldn't have formed into what they are today, and we wouldn't have to be going back into Iraq.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News