Started By
Message

re: Why are most leagues PPR?

Posted on 8/27/14 at 7:10 pm to
Posted by TheIndulger
Member since Sep 2011
19239 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 7:10 pm to
Then maybe they should increase the value of a yard for a WR or decrease it for a RB. I just think number of receptions is meaningless.

quote:

To make it more funner


Only correct answer IMO
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72059 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

Yes QBs are way more important than any player on the field... Why do you think they make the most money?


Yet they are all drafted late in drafts except for 3 guys? How is that important?

quote:

Then maybe they should increase the value of a yard for a WR or decrease it for a RB. I just think number of receptions is meaningless.


You act like RBs don't benefit. Why are jamal Charles, Lesean McCoy, and forte regarded as 3 of the best RBs in the NFL?

Pierre Thomas's ability to catch the ball isn't valuable? Darren Sproles? Danny Woodhead? Joique Bell?

PPR benefits every position: RB, WR, and TE. QBs don't need help. 64% of the top 25 scorers were QBs
Posted by AirborneJonny
Fort Bragg
Member since Aug 2014
322 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 7:47 pm to
.5 per reception is the way to go
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram