- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Australian Bureau of Meteorology accused of Criminally Adjusted Global Warming
Posted on 8/26/14 at 4:07 pm
Posted on 8/26/14 at 4:07 pm
quote:
The Australian Bureau of Meteorology has been caught red-handed manipulating temperature data to show "global warming" where none actually exists.
At Amberley, Queensland, for example, the data at a weather station showing 1 degree Celsius cooling per century was "homogenized" (adjusted) by the Bureau so that it instead showed a 2.5 degrees warming per century.
At Rutherglen, Victoria, a cooling trend of -0.35 degrees C per century was magically transformed at the stroke of an Australian meteorologist's pen into a warming trend of 1.73 degrees C per century.
Last year, the Australian Bureau of Meteorology made headlines in the liberal media by claiming that 2013 was Australia's hottest year on record. This prompted Australia's alarmist-in-chief Tim Flannery - an English literature graduate who later went on to earn his scientific credentials with a PhD in palaeontology, digging up ancient kangaroo bones - to observe that global warming in Australia was "like climate change on steroids."
Though the Bureau of Meteorology has insisted its data adjustments are "robust", it has been unable to come up with a credible explanation as to why it translated real-world data showing a cooling trend into homogenized data showing a warming trend.
LINK
17
Posted on 8/26/14 at 4:10 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 8/26/14 at 4:11 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
The end justifies the means......signed all progressives/liberals.
Posted on 8/26/14 at 4:19 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
This seems to be happening more and more.
Posted on 8/26/14 at 4:35 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
manipulating temperature data to show "global warming" where none actually exists
Posted on 8/26/14 at 4:38 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
The man made heat seems to be causing scientists to do crazy things like manipulate data. There is no end to this disaster.
Posted on 8/26/14 at 5:29 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
The Australian Bureau of Meteorology has been caught red-handed manipulating temperature data to show "global warming" where none actually exists.
Yeah now who's the damn denier?
Posted on 8/26/14 at 5:33 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Australian Bureau of Meteorology accused of Criminally Adjusted Global Warming
CON-sensus?
: dunno :
Posted on 8/26/14 at 6:04 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
More smoke? More evidence of a pattern of disingenuousness? No way. Big research is only looking out for our interests. Go tell big oil and their media minions to pound sand.
Posted on 8/27/14 at 3:03 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Okay, I got three links deep (and past a Google paywall) before hitting Graham Lloyd, who is pretty much a skeptic stenographer, and still had no details provided. Someone want to take a stab at specifics, or is this the usual "upward adjustment = WARMIST FRAUD" snarkfest? Because if it's anything like the NOAA tempest from earlier this year (and it sounds exactly like it so far, right down to a blogger taking umbrage at cherry-picked individual stations while studiously avoiding any kind of systematic analysis) I guarantee those "adjustments" were published and peer reviewed. Not exactly my idea of "criminal."
This post was edited on 8/27/14 at 3:05 am
Posted on 8/27/14 at 6:28 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Wow. Breitbart says that a former right wing think tanker with a blog says that AGW is fake.
Now that's news!
Let us know when Dr. Marohasy publishes her findings.
Now that's news!
Let us know when Dr. Marohasy publishes her findings.
This post was edited on 8/27/14 at 6:31 am
Posted on 8/27/14 at 8:46 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Linking Breitbart which links a GW denier think tank is about as solid as one can get. I mean it's got the credibility of SEC Crazy.
Posted on 8/27/14 at 12:22 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
The Australian Bureau of Meteorology has been caught red-handed manipulating temperature data to show "global warming" where none actually exists.
At Amberley, Queensland, for example, the data at a weather station showing 1 degree Celsius cooling per century was "homogenized" (adjusted) by the Bureau so that it instead showed a 2.5 degrees warming per century.
At Rutherglen, Victoria, a cooling trend of -0.35 degrees C per century was magically transformed at the stroke of an Australian meteorologist's pen into a warming trend of 1.73 degrees C per century.
Last year, the Australian Bureau of Meteorology made headlines in the liberal media by claiming that 2013 was Australia's hottest year on record. This prompted Australia's alarmist-in-chief Tim Flannery - an English literature graduate who later went on to earn his scientific credentials with a PhD in palaeontology, digging up ancient kangaroo bones - to observe that global warming in Australia was "like climate change on steroids."
Though the Bureau of Meteorology has insisted its data adjustments are "robust", it has been unable to come up with a credible explanation as to why it translated real-world data showing a cooling trend into homogenized data showing a warming trend.
Two stations showed a warming trend after homogenization when they showed a cooling trend before.
Wow. A conspiracy must be afoot.
quote:
"homogenized" (adjusted)
fricking idiots.This post was edited on 8/27/14 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 8/27/14 at 12:33 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I love the false controversy
"Bureau should supply details of its data revision"
LINK
OK
LINK
"Bureau should supply details of its data revision"
LINK
OK
LINK
quote:
These data have been comprehensively analysed for inhomogeneities and data errors ensuring a set of station temperature data which are suitable for the analysis of climate variability and trends. For the purposes of merging station series and correcting inhomogeneities, the data set has been developed using a technique, the percentile-matching (PM) algorithm, which applies differing adjustments to daily data depending on their position in the frequency distribution. This method is intended to produce data sets that are homogeneous for higher-order statistical properties, such as variance and the frequency of extremes, as well as for mean values. The PM algorithm is evaluated and found to have clear advantages over adjustments based on monthly means, particularly in the homogenization of temperature extremes. Copyright
This post was edited on 8/27/14 at 12:34 pm
Posted on 8/27/14 at 1:02 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
More Truth from the Left !
If the truth doesn't fit your agenda, just change the Truth !
Leftists are dangerous and the US Democrat Party is in bed with the Left.
Keep voting Democrat, America !
We are almost there !
If the truth doesn't fit your agenda, just change the Truth !
Leftists are dangerous and the US Democrat Party is in bed with the Left.
Keep voting Democrat, America !
We are almost there !
Posted on 8/27/14 at 2:12 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
AND THERE WERE EMAILS!!!!
#flatearthsociety
#flatearthsociety
Posted on 8/27/14 at 2:44 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Breitbart, LOL
read the article, not one sourced paper refuting the numbers just an opinion of Jennifer Marohasy and the author...a biologist funded by an investment trust and a blogger.
nice work there Hail, carry on the fight.
you right wing deniers really fricking suck at sourcing,vetting information before you post.
read the article, not one sourced paper refuting the numbers just an opinion of Jennifer Marohasy and the author...a biologist funded by an investment trust and a blogger.
nice work there Hail, carry on the fight.
you right wing deniers really fricking suck at sourcing,vetting information before you post.
Posted on 8/28/14 at 12:34 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
You guys figure it out yet?
Not only is it profitable ( see Al Gore ) for insiders, but One World Government types, the Utopia seekers like Ibama, Clinton, etc etc see the " Coming Together for the good of the World" as their last/best chance if bringing the world together under Global Law/International Law.
Some foods need a Binder in order to bring it together.
These radicals see Global Warming as a Binder to bring the world together under International Law, they see no religions, no borders, no wars.
Not only is it profitable ( see Al Gore ) for insiders, but One World Government types, the Utopia seekers like Ibama, Clinton, etc etc see the " Coming Together for the good of the World" as their last/best chance if bringing the world together under Global Law/International Law.
Some foods need a Binder in order to bring it together.
These radicals see Global Warming as a Binder to bring the world together under International Law, they see no religions, no borders, no wars.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News