Started By
Message

re: Dawkins: "immoral to bring [Down's Syndrome baby] into the world"

Posted on 8/21/14 at 1:13 pm to
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58198 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

I always thought morality was either yes or no. Not relative.



Well I believe it is but some on here seem to be outraged that Dawkins said he would abort a Down's syndrome child but on the other hand, they are fine with a woman aborting a child just because she doesn't want it! To me, you are either outraged because you are against abortion, or you shouldn't be outraged at all. There really isn't any middle ground.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71443 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 8:38 pm to
quote:


Well I believe it is but some on here seem to be outraged that Dawkins said he would abort a Down's syndrome child but on the other hand, they are fine with a woman aborting a child just because she doesn't want it! To me, you are either outraged because you are against abortion, or you shouldn't be outraged at all. There really isn't any middle ground.


I understand your point, but I can see a distinction here. Even if you're pro-choice, the idea that someone is unfit to live simply because they're "defective" is a scary prospect.

There's also the fact that Dawkins is passing judgment on women who make a reproductive decision he doesn't like. That makes him no better than Rick Santorum.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram