Started By
Message

re: Why are the Redskins getting so much heat?

Posted on 8/21/14 at 12:37 pm to
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

what is a more accurate description?

redskin

or

indian
Indian. The definition has changed. Its genesis if of course due to Columbus's mistake and stubbornness, just as Hitler changed the meaning of Aryan and the swastika.


Just as "Hispanic" which meant Spaniard (as in, Europe) to the Romans, now means people of mixed Spanish and Native descent living in the Western Hemisphere. Are you suggesting we call them brownskins instead?
This post was edited on 8/21/14 at 12:38 pm
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 8/21/14 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Indian


incorrect, while tens of thousands of years ago, they traveled from the land now known as india...they aren't indian. They do however have a skin color most closely resembling red (I'm actually color blind so please don't get into further detail with actual color )and obviously I get where its origins come from; however the original meaning and the current meaning are not the same...which leads me to

quote:

The definition has changed.

what a novel idea...so you mean a word like "redskin" could theoretically not be racist even though it once was

quote:

just as Hitler changed the meaning of Aryan and the swastika.


precisely...and it can change back in 150 years...who the frick knows. You're assuming that only works in one direction...except you're not because you think "indian" is a more accurate description of native americans


words mean, what we want them to mean
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram