Started By
Message

re: Is not naming a starter hurting both QB's?

Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:14 am to
Posted by ItsThatDude12
Giving out Mercy Knees
Member since Apr 2009
9927 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:14 am to
I understand competition is a good thing but at this point when you're preparing for Wisconsin maximizing your starters reps would pay more dividends than splitting it up.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:17 am to
quote:

I understand competition is a good thing but at this point when you're preparing for Wisconsin maximizing your starters reps would pay more dividends than splitting it up.


Plenty of time for that.

And, I hate to be "that guy"...but, Do you really think that you have a better handle on proper QB preparation than Cam Cameron?


Posted by TigerNE
Everett, MA
Member since Jul 2013
1096 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:18 am to
They both need reps if they're both going to play.

I think Miles has handled this very well.
Posted by LSUfan20005
Member since Sep 2012
8820 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:18 am to
quote:

this won't be settled until the middle of september IMO


This. I think we use games 2 and 3 to really work the QB's and pick a true starter.

Gotta get through game 1 first, though.
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
62064 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 11:46 am to
quote:

but at this point when you're preparing for Wisconsin maximizing your starters reps would pay more dividends than splitting it up.


LSU has not started "Wisconsin-specific" preparation yet. I believe this Thursday is when they will start prepping for the Badgers. Up until then it has been learning about what LSU does.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram