- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Police come under ‘heavy gunfire’ in Ferguson, arrest 31 people
Posted on 8/19/14 at 8:23 am to TROLA
Posted on 8/19/14 at 8:23 am to TROLA
I'd say that there is a really good chance that under the scrutiny that the police are under that they did not return fire.
That said, heavy fire is a very subjective term. Does that mean three shots or three hundred?
That said, heavy fire is a very subjective term. Does that mean three shots or three hundred?
Posted on 8/19/14 at 8:31 am to DeltaDoc
The longer this continues, the better the police outcome in the long run. If the national guard is needed, how you blame the Ferguson police for needing to be militarized?
Posted on 8/19/14 at 9:54 am to DeltaDoc
quote:
I'd say that there is a really good chance that under the scrutiny that the police are under that they did not return fire.
That said, heavy fire is a very subjective term. Does that mean three shots or three hundred?
There is a precedent for police not returning under such circumstances. In Oxford, MS in 1962, 55 U.S. Marshalls and 40 soldiers and national guardsmen were wounded or injured protecting James Meredith, and they never returned fire, because of JFK's desire to keep things from escalating, and his order not return fire unless Meredith's life was directly threatened.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News