Started By
Message

re: Father (Not Guilty) of killing drunk driver who killed his sons.Update

Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:04 pm to
Posted by LSUtigerME
Walker, LA
Member since Oct 2012
3809 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:04 pm to
If there was more evidence that he did it, he should be convicted. Sentencing should be reduced IMO based on mitigating circumstances and act of rage/love/passion.

Based on the evidence in the case as presented, no, he shouldn't. Everything is circumstantial.
Posted by Tigerlaff
FIGHTING out of the Carencro Sonic
Member since Jan 2010
20893 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

Based on the evidence in the case as presented, no, he shouldn't. Everything is circumstantial.


Thank you. I thought we were just going to have a bunch of dumbass TH03's here to tell us what a slam dunk case this is. It's a very interesting fact pattern.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram