Started By
Message

re: Response to naysayers of ARMY Document leaked

Posted on 8/18/14 at 3:26 pm to
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

Thats not a real Army ROE flowchart.


The document linked is legit. Current Army doctrine.
Posted by kilo
Member since Oct 2011
27433 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

Current Army doctrine.




Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34834 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

Current Army doctrine.


How much resistance will the Army have against committing violence against Americans, in your opinion?
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16635 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

FM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations, a U.S. Army manual that describes how political activists in prison camps will be indoctrinated by specially assigned psychological operations officers.


Not an active FM.

quote:

The 132-page document, titled U.S. Army Techniques Publication 3-39.33: Civil Disturbances (PDF), was written in April 2014 and recently obtained by Public Intelligence.


Did these dumbasses not see the distribution notice at the bottom of the cover page?

quote:

DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.


Yeah, really dug something up there...

Because modern jackasses don't read too good...

quote:

2-4. For the U.S. Army, conducting civil disturbance missions within the United States. will vary greatly when compared to conducting civil disturbance missions within a foreign country where the U.S. Army is conducting operations. Except as expressly authorized by the Constitution of the United States or by another act of Congress, the Posse Comitatus Act (18 USC 1385) prohibits the use of the Active Army as
enforcement officials to execute state or federal law and perform direct law enforcement functions within Chapter 2 2-2 ATP 3-39.33 21 April 2014
CONUS.


That basically sums up the difference between Title 10 (Regular Army, Reserve Soldiers on AD) vs Title 32/SAD National Guard which do have DLA as long as it's the state that is paying them and not Uncle Sam.
This post was edited on 8/18/14 at 5:13 pm
Posted by MSCoastTigerGirl
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
35525 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

Wolfhound45


I'll admit that I didn't read the entire article but wouldn't the military, aside from theCoast Guard and National Guard, being used against citizens be violation of Posse Comitatus?

Serious question. And I'm directing the question at you because you know your shite and I respect the hell out of you and your opinion.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram