- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why does the word "profit" have a negative connotation?
Posted on 8/18/14 at 8:33 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 8/18/14 at 8:33 am to SlowFlowPro
I have no beef with Walmart. The beef is when companies switch from the US to say Malaysia so that their labor costs are cut tremendously. I guess the idea of paying 12 cents an hour to make a $200 sneaker etc. or when gas prices skyrocket for bs reasons. Changing to winter blend raise prices changing to summer raise prices
Posted on 8/18/14 at 8:55 am to JEAUXBLEAUX
quote:
I have no beef with Walmart.
Alot of liberal/progressives do, yet they ignore the overall benefits that Walmart provides to the very people they try to pander to. It's quite ironic. They try to make poor people hate the very entity that is helping them the most! A cheap goods provider.
quote:
The beef is when companies switch from the US to say Malaysia so that their labor costs are cut tremendously.
Again there are 2 sides of the story. You could say how dare Nike take advantage of cheap labor in undeveloped countries, all while charging $200 for a shoe that cost $1 to make.
I could say, those people in that undeveloped country wouldn't have ANY means for income if Nike wasn't providing them with jobs. Sure 10 cents/hr sounds like exploitation to us, but to them that's being able to eat for a week. Otherwise they would have to try their hand at finding a job or food in an otherwise undeveloped area, which I'm sure doesn't have that many offerings for employment.
Also, what would you have Nike do? Move manufacturing to the U.S. where they would undoubtedly pay minimum wage for an unskilled factory job, then receive the same backlash, yet have smaller margins, have investors in an uproar, causing their stock to plummet, all while causing them to increase the price of that shoe to $300, and then they are crucified for having minimum wage employees make a $300 shoe! It's a lose lose for them. Might as well take the cheapest labor.
Again, which is it?
Posted on 8/18/14 at 11:33 am to JEAUXBLEAUX
quote:Would you pay $100 for a gallon of milk?
The beef is when companies switch from the US to say Malaysia so that their labor costs are cut tremendously.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News