Started By
Message

re: Michael Brown question?

Posted on 8/15/14 at 11:26 pm to
Posted by Crimson Mafia IIIX
Huntsville
Member since Feb 2011
3656 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 11:26 pm to
Good point. If you are satisfied with the original autopsy report, than why have another one done.
Posted by Five0
Member since Dec 2009
11354 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 11:33 pm to
quote:

If you are satisfied with the original autopsy report, than why have another one done.


I'll take, because you are a narcissistic race baiting lawyer giving the family crap advice to further your own notoriety and name recognition for $1000 Alex.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83951 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 11:58 pm to
quote:

Good point. If you are satisfied with the original autopsy report, than why have another one done.


Right. I mean, no one has ever falsified an autopsy report before.
Posted by Porky
Member since Aug 2008
19103 posts
Posted on 8/16/14 at 4:07 am to
quote:

Good point. If you are satisfied with the original autopsy report, than why have another one done.

From what I understand, full forensic evidence hasn't been released and I'd be surprised if it is until a second autopsy is performed. All that has been released so far is that he "died of gunshot wounds", toxicology report pending. Two autopsies should result in a higher level of legal credibility and validity because they should help ensure an overall higher level of integrity in respect to the forensic investigation.
This post was edited on 8/16/14 at 4:23 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram