Started By
Message

re: Realistically...unarmed assailant attacks armed victim: is assailant unarmed?

Posted on 8/15/14 at 8:50 pm to
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 8:50 pm to
I don't know how the law reads from state to state, but this is how I see it.

1) Assuming that neither person is a law enforcement officer, the person being followed, stalked, chased or attacked ALWAYS has the right to use deadly force, regardless of size, as long as he or she is not fleeing a crime. Conversely, the person doing the stalking and following never has the right to use deadly force in such situations (eg. George Zimmerman - GUILTY).

2) A private citizen pursuing a fleeing criminal always has the right to use deadly force regardless of either person's size (eg. Joe Horn - NOT GUILTY).

3) Women have the right to use deadly force to get men away from them but they don't have a right to use deadly force to settle scores.
Posted by fleaux
section 0
Member since Aug 2012
8741 posts
Posted on 8/15/14 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

the person doing the stalking and following never has the right to use deadly force in such situations (eg. George Zimmerman - GUILTY).


You still don't care much about facts, do you? If a person was following someone but then was walking back to his car and is attacked, is it ok to use deadly force then????
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram