- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ISIS leader a former US Detainee?
Posted on 8/12/14 at 10:14 pm to Lsut81
Posted on 8/12/14 at 10:14 pm to Lsut81
This is why I've always thought Gitmo was a bad idea. Either execute them after we've extracted intel, put them on trial and sentence them swiftly, or release them after interrogation. Releasing them after multiple years at Gitmo does nothing but make the Islamic rock stars who have nothing to lose and can be very influential.
Posted on 8/12/14 at 10:20 pm to upgrayedd
He wasn't at Gitmo and was released in 2009.
Posted on 8/13/14 at 10:45 am to upgrayedd
The first problem is that we never properly classified the detainees properly. Those who were engaged in armed combat against our troops, and were not wearing uniforms or other items to visibly identify them as combatants from a distance, should have been treated as unlawful combatants and been dealt with accordingly. Collect whatever useful intelligence you can from them, and them punish them to the full extent of the laws we have adopted for ourselves. This would have allowed for their execution or other lesser punishments deemed appropriate.
All that the Laws of Land Warfare required of us was that we held a competent tribunal to determine that captives were not entitled to prisoner of war status. A competent tribunal could have been nothing more than a review of the circumstances of capture by the local commanding officer based on interviews with participants in the actions leading to the capture.
All that the Laws of Land Warfare required of us was that we held a competent tribunal to determine that captives were not entitled to prisoner of war status. A competent tribunal could have been nothing more than a review of the circumstances of capture by the local commanding officer based on interviews with participants in the actions leading to the capture.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News