Started By
Message

re: The Oxford Declaration on Freedom of Thought and Expression

Posted on 8/13/14 at 12:12 pm to
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 8/13/14 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

You've misrepresented the facts of that case and the boards reaction to it.
No, I didn't.
quote:

The bakery never refused to sell anything to a client on account of the client's open sexual preference.
It is literally what they did.
quote:

The bakery simply refused to offer a certain product on the grounds that doing so would be against their personal religious beliefs.
This is also literally what they did.
quote:

I think many on the board conveniently failed to see the obvious difference between the two.
I see the difference between the two, but they do have one very important similarity; they both are true.

The baker has the right to believe anything he wishes. The baker hasn't the right to act on that belief in any way he wishes.
Posted by LSUnKaty
Katy, TX
Member since Dec 2008
4353 posts
Posted on 8/13/14 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

It is literally what they did.
Nope. They are happy to sell products to gay clients. The just refused to make a certain custom product. The refusal was based on the nature of the product requested, not on the basis of the customers sexual orientation.

Let me ask you, according to The Oxford Declaration on Freedom of Thought and Expression, if person A believes X is morally wrong while person B maintains X is objectively good, can person B compel person A to do X for the common good?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram