- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Oxford Declaration on Freedom of Thought and Expression
Posted on 8/13/14 at 11:48 am to Rex
Posted on 8/13/14 at 11:48 am to Rex
quote:I think you're right. That's why I cited this in my OP:
As for eternal existence, it's still an attitude we can ascribe to most Christians.
quote:One recent issue I had a bit of trouble with was the one that involved a bakery refusing to sell a cake to a certain client on account of the client's open sexual preference as it stood against the baker's personal beliefs. I seem to remember that the baker lost the case; not sure. Many here thought that this was a first amendment violation. Of course it wasn't since the state limited not the baker's right to free religion or belief, but the baker's right to free commerce. The belief wasn't challenged; the entrepreneurial action based on that belief is what was challenged and subsequently limited. I think many on the board conveniently failed to see the obvious difference between the two.
Freedom of belief is absolute but the freedom to act on a belief is not.
Posted on 8/13/14 at 12:00 pm to ballscaster
quote:You've misrepresented the facts of that case and the boards reaction to it.
One recent issue I had a bit of trouble with was the one that involved a bakery refusing to sell a cake to a certain client on account of the client's open sexual preference as it stood against the baker's personal beliefs. I seem to remember that the baker lost the case; not sure.
The bakery never refused to sell anything to a client on account of the client's open sexual preference. The bakery simply refused to offer a certain product on the grounds that doing so would be against their personal religious beliefs. I think many on the board conveniently failed to see the obvious difference between the two.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News