Started By
Message

Do you see cooks as a poor man's sanders?

Posted on 8/12/14 at 8:22 am
Posted by easy money
Member since Feb 2005
14430 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 8:22 am
I see their roles for heavy passing teams being similar. I see cooks as a more explosive receiver and I really don't see a risk in taking him later in the draft. I'd also rather have Tate over sanders who is projected in that same general area. What is your take on Cooks?
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
54194 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 8:28 am to
I see him getting a ton of work.

Would be willing to take him in the 7th, maybe 6th.
Posted by lsuhunt555
Teakwood Village Breh
Member since Nov 2008
38414 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 8:32 am to
Sanders who?
Posted by Libertariantiger
Member since Nov 2012
981 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 8:34 am to
I see him as a better, more explosive Lance Moore. Remember when Moore was healthy he was a double digit TD threat. But limited upside bc of spreading the ball around. WR3 in my mind. He would be soooooo valuable if he was a RB, but being WR caps his value unles he does best case scenario, which is possible. But I'm drafting him based on Lance Moore's best case scenario. WR3 w/upside.
Posted by NOFLyZ0ne28
West Florida
Member since Apr 2014
876 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 9:07 am to
I think of it like this: E. Sanders is the 6th option I would want to have, including QB, if I had any Broncos players on my team. On the other hand, Cooks is the 3rd option I'd like to have from the Saints offense.

IMO:
Manning --- Brees
DT88 --- Graham
Ball --- Cooks
Thomas --- Colston
Welker --- Pick a RB
Sanders --- Stills
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278674 posts
Posted on 8/12/14 at 10:48 am to
id rather Cooks then Sanders.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram