Started By
Message

re: James Brady's death ruled a homicide?!?!

Posted on 8/9/14 at 12:50 am to
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36129 posts
Posted on 8/9/14 at 12:50 am to
quote:



You're talking about intent to kill and that's exactly why Hinckley was convicted. But Brady didn't die right after being shot and he wasn't already dead he went on to live another 33 years after being shot.

Do you not see the difference there?



If I inject you with HIV with intent to kill and you die 33 years later from AIDS - its murder. You know it is. Its murder that involves 33 years of torture before the grand finale.

This is no different.
This post was edited on 8/9/14 at 12:51 am
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 8/9/14 at 12:56 am to
quote:

If I inject you with HIV with intent to kill and you die 33 years later from AIDS - its murder. You know it is. Its murder that involves 33 years of torture before the grand finale.

This is no different.



If it's murder why was Hinckley found not guilty then? Why is he free now?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram