Started By
Message

re: Server 2008 update goes bad...

Posted on 8/7/14 at 9:35 am to
Posted by TigerGman
Center of the Universe
Member since Sep 2006
11255 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 9:35 am to
quote:

You should probably never just click "install updates" if a machine is as critical as this one seems to be.




Well that's why I'm asking. I was trying to get a handle on what you IT guys do in actual practice.

ETA: Still, you guys seem to be talking in general for all systems. My question is why would an older system be more susceptible to problems. I simply don't see it. It will either run the OS or it won't. Updates shouldn't do anything to change system requirements.
This post was edited on 8/7/14 at 9:40 am
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
27563 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 9:50 am to
Microsoft Updates are really the last line of defense in securing critical systems. Sure, IT people install them when they can. But, they aren't the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc. line of defense as far as security is concerned.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28712 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 10:01 am to
quote:

My question is why would an older system be more susceptible to problems. I simply don't see it. It will either run the OS or it won't. Updates shouldn't do anything to change system requirements.
It's not that an update might change system requirements, it's the fact that any update has the potential to cause a problem, and the older the system the more likely it is that it is widely depended on.

I don't know the specific scenario for your friend's company, and we can't be sure that they have an actual policy of "never update old systems", but generally the older the system, the more it is relied upon, and the more cautious you should be about changing anything.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram