Started By
Message
locked post

Clinton speech from 9/10/2001 - I could have gotten OBL but didn't

Posted on 7/31/14 at 3:23 pm
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96437 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 3:23 pm
LINK

Bill Clinton gave a speech the day before 9/11 in Australia telling an audience that he could have taken out Osama Bin Laden but didn't because it would have meant taking out a village of 300 people in Kandahar, Afghanistan.

This audio was recorded at the time but never released until this week, when the former head of the Australian Labour Party remembered it and released his copy of it.


It's very interesting that this is just surfacing now, especially considering the huge legal battle that the Clintons put up against the makers of The Path To 9/11 TV movie, to the point where the film was only shown once on TV and never given a video release.
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
27687 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 3:26 pm to
Hindsight's always 20/20. At the time, I understand his reasoning for not sacrificing 300 people for Bin Laden.

I really don't have a ton to complain about when it comes to Bill as the President. and I loved Gdub.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27325 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

“I nearly got him. And I could have killed him, but I would have to destroy a little town called Kandahar in Afghanistan and kill 300 innocent women and children, and then I would have been no better than him. And so I didn’t do it.”
I agree with him.
Posted by wheelr
Member since Jul 2012
5149 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 3:31 pm to
Surely he had other opportunities. Or was OBL always surrounded by 300 people in Kandahar?
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 4:25 pm to
He also didn't inhale
He also didn't have sex with that woman..........
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112605 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 5:19 pm to
Bill Clinton has never told the truth in his life. Why would anyone believe him now?
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 5:19 pm to
Think about the context of the speech Clinton was delivering. Do you believe he was expressing regret, or self-congratulations for his restraint? All I can do is guess, but it is strange that almost 13 years have gone by and this is the first mention of the speech. How many times has he addressed this issue since?

In 2001 Bill Clinton claims he could have gotten bin Laden, but in 2008 FactCheck.org said he couldn't. LINK One of them is wrong. I wonder which?
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
45199 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:04 pm to
am no fan of Bill Clinton, but I can't hold this against the man. I would have made the same choice if presented with the same intel.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25395 posts
Posted on 8/1/14 at 8:22 am to
We could have possibly killed the man behind 9/11 years before, but it would have been a politically risky choice for Clinton. The convenient plan was to ignore the problem after our embassy bombings and wait for the next guy to deal with it.

IMO, his administration has contributed significantly to our vulnerability on 9/11 by making politically expedient decisions instead of leading.
This post was edited on 8/1/14 at 8:28 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram