re: Currently residing in Wisconsin and dear lord

quote:

---

I read it

---

What more do you want? The poster I responded to said that LSU D will be better than I think, which I have never actually contended. He then said Wisconsin had to replace its front seven, which I find to be somewhat untrue. So, my rebuttal was the same as what he anticipated I said: Wisconsin D will be more experienced than what [he] thinks.

There are five projected starters along the front seven that have started multiple games in their career. On top of that, Dave Aranda's 3-4 defense calls for an abundance of shuffling, especially along the defensive front. In other words, there is not a 'severe' shortage of experience. These guys aren't being thrown into the fire, but they will have to become acclimated to becoming full-time starters.

The unit as a whole does not concern me as much as replacing Chris Borland.