Started By
Message

re: OT Lawyers: Legal question regarding a phone and a dog!

Posted on 7/30/14 at 8:55 am to
Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
58405 posts
Posted on 7/30/14 at 8:55 am to
After reading, this thread did not go the way I though it would. My thoughts:

Wether or not someone else's 11 year old has an iPhone or not is irrelevant. Most, key word most, dog owners train their dogs not to take things off of tables, maybe this one did, maybe they didn't. Either way, we all know dogs can be mischievous when they think no one is looking. I feel both parties are at fault, and the dog owner should offer to help pay.

When you folks go to the pool, where so you leave your stuff?
Posted by LouisianaLady
Member since Mar 2009
81261 posts
Posted on 7/30/14 at 9:51 am to
quote:

I feel both parties are at fault, and the dog owner should offer to help pay.

When you folks go to the pool, where so you leave your stuff?



I agree with this. They may not "have" to.. and there may not be legal recourse for the SIL, but I think it's pretty messed up they didn't offer anything.

The age is irrelevant to me, but I think the age plays into their decision not to offer to pay anything. I think if I was sitting with a friend in their backyard and their dog came and ate my phone, my friend would most likely feel awful and offer to replace it. But because it's a child and this likely happened when the parents weren't even around (or maybe they were.. irrelevant), it doesn't seem as important to replace in their minds.

Hell, I'm sure if your SIL was hanging out with them and this same thing happened, they'd have offered. It's because it's a child that they're not.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram