Started By
Message

Greg Maddux HOF selection question

Posted on 7/27/14 at 11:35 am
Posted by Al Bundy Bulldog
The Grindfather
Member since Dec 2010
35817 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 11:35 am
I was reading about today's MLB Hall of fame inductees and noticed Greg Maddux got 97% of the vote from writers. Statistically he was the most consistent pitcher of his era with 355 career wins and never was connected to PEDs (Clemens)

With that said, how can any voter ego watched baseball between 1988-2008 not feel Maddux is worthy of the HOF? What's their justification for not voting? Do some just straight up refuse to vote for first timers?

In a couple years if Ken Griffey Jr. Isn't infamous I think those who refuse to vote should have their credentials taken away.
This post was edited on 7/27/14 at 11:36 am
Posted by CunningLinguist
Dallas, TX
Member since Mar 2006
18789 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 11:36 am to
Old arse baseball writers do that because Babe Ruth was not unanimous
Posted by LSUMJ
BR
Member since Sep 2004
19908 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 11:39 am to
No one has ever been unanimous so current writers think they need to be old school and keep that going
Dumb
Posted by CountryVolFan
Knoxville, TN
Member since Dec 2008
2971 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 11:40 am to
If you don't vote for a 300 game winner not connected to PEDs you should lose your vote.
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 11:42 am to
Voters are allowed a certain amount of votes, many will leave off a sure thing like Maddux in order for another player to receive votes and stay on the ballot or get in.
Posted by WPBTiger
Parts Unknown
Member since Nov 2011
31218 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 11:43 am to
quote:

No one has ever been unanimous so current writers think they need to be old school and keep that going


This.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47814 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 11:46 am to
i'll play devil's advocate. if you know without a shadow of a doubt that Maddux or whoever is getting in, he doesn't need 100% as opposed to 95% to be "more in"

so you take that vote and spread it to guys who might need it to stay on the ballot, a guy who is at 70% or a guy who has a goal of just getting 1 HOF vote

personally i think you should name 10 guys on your ballot and vote for 8 with two "backups". if one or two of the 8 gets 90% or more, then the votes count for the other two guys you named
This post was edited on 7/27/14 at 11:51 am
Posted by DaBeerz
Member since Sep 2004
16995 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 11:59 am to
Why do you want KGJr to be infamous?
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
83400 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 12:09 pm to
11 voters left Babe Ruth off their ballots

37 voters left Walter Johnson off their ballots

Cy Young wasn't a first ballot hall of famer
Posted by Thurber
NWLA
Member since Aug 2013
15402 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 12:43 pm to
How could you not vote for Maddux?
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36140 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 4:25 pm to
he's getting more respect than a lot of other highly qualified players who absolutely deserved to be in the hall of fame

willie mays, stan musial, and ted williams all received less than 96% of the vote.
Posted by cantseefade1
Barzoom, Mars
Member since Mar 2013
638 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

I think those who refuse to vote should have their credentials taken away.


This, but they will die soon anyway. Maddux is unquestionably a HOF.
Posted by TigerNavyDoc
Camp Lejeune, NC
Member since Oct 2009
959 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 6:22 pm to


"Oh, Dusty. In-famous is when you're MORE than famous. This man El Guapo, he's not just famous, he's IN-famous."
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram