- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 4th Circuit COA and dissent in Halbig are hilariously wrong about "intent"
Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:58 pm to MMauler
Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:58 pm to MMauler
quote:
So, if you're now saying that an Exchange can be "created" under sec. 1321 (and isn't just "the mechanism" the Feds use to create a State's Exchange under 1311), then CLEARLY you do not come under sec. 36B as sec. 36B tax credits are only available to an Exchange established by the State under section 1311.
A 1321 exchange is "such an exchange" (a state run exchange).
This post was edited on 7/25/14 at 2:59 pm
2
Posted on 7/25/14 at 3:01 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:
A 1321 exchange is "such an exchange" (a state run exchange).
WRONG. It's an exchange established by and run by the Feds. It's is NOT a state run exchange. "Such an exchange" refers to an exchange established by sec. 1321, within 1321.
Posted on 7/25/14 at 3:02 pm to SpidermanTUba
MMauler is hilarious, I'll give him that.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News