re: 4th Circuit COA and dissent in Halbig are hilariously wrong about "intent"

quote:

---

I never said they were created identically.

---

That's not what I said you said.

When presented with the CLEAR AND UNAMBIGUOUS WORDING of the statute, you made the completely insane and ridiculous argument that an exchange created under 1321 is an exchange created under 1311 by stating that 1321 is "merely the mechanism for HHS to implement the state's Exchange" under sec. 1311.


So, why would they need to refer to 1311 OR 1321 at a different part of the statute?


If your argument has ANY merit, then they should only have referred to sec. 1311 because sec. 1321 is "merely the mechanism" for the Feds to set up an exchange under sec. 1311.



And, weren't you on here bragging a few months ago about how low your premiums were and how much "insurance" (and I use that term loosely) has already paid for your preexisting conditions - all because you just don't want to work and earn your own insurance?

quote:

---

Your next biggest problem is that you're a hate-filled Republican with blinders.

---

Now, you've hurt my feelings!