- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 4th Circuit COA and dissent in Halbig are hilariously wrong about "intent"
Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:29 pm to Rex
Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:29 pm to Rex
Rex on 1321 ....
quote:
BY DEFINITION, an Exchange is a legal entity established by a State. Sec 1321 is merely the mechanism for HHS to implement the state's Exchange under sec 1311 standards when the state can not or chooses not to. There are no "Federal exchanges", there are only Federally-facilitated exchanges.
quote:
I never said they were created identically.
You said that an Exchange established under sec. 1321 "is merely the mechanism for HHS to implement the state's Exchange."
So, why would they say "an Exchange under section 1311(f)(3) or 1321(c) of the [Act]” if an exchange under 1321(c) is merely the mechanism for HHS to implement the state's Exchange -- UNDER SEC. 1311?
More LIES from Rex.
Seriously, have you no shame???
1
Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:31 pm to MMauler
quote:
You said that an Exchange established under sec. 1321 "is merely the mechanism for HHS to implement the state's Exchange."
Yes, and that's correct.
I never said they were created identically.
Your biggest problem is that you can't read. Your next biggest problem is that you're a hate-filled Republican with blinders.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News