- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 4th Circuit COA and dissent in Halbig are hilariously wrong about "intent"
Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
isn't this only an issue b/c of the USSC ruling from a few years ago? if so, that invalidates your argument.
Explain what you mean, please.
1
Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:48 pm to Rex
quote:
Explain what you mean, please.
1. the bill is written with a certain interpretation
2. the USSC invalidates portions of the bill mandating state action
3. your claimed inconsistency only exists due to the ruling, and has no bearing on intent, as the inconsistency resulted far after the bill's writing (and thus, the intent is a relic of the past that cannot be changed by that point)
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News