Wait, hold on. Earlier you stated that any exchange established under sec. 1321 is necessarily created under 1311. So, why would they need to point out 1321(c) at this part (ESPECIALLY WITH AN "OR"), if every exchange established under 1321(c) is also deemed to be established under 1311????

If anything, this language PROVES that an exchange established under sec. 1321 is NOT an exchange established under sec. 1311.

I can't wait for the day when you have to start paying for your own damn insurance instead of thinking that other people should pay for it. I just hope that they come after you for all the back premiums that you SHOULD OWE back.

Say goodbye to your subsidies you LEECH.

This post was edited on 7/25/14 at 2:18 pm

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Rex

Here, there, and nowhere

Member since Sep 2004

66001 posts

Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:22 pm to MMauler

quote:
Wait, hold on. Earlier you stated that any exchange established under sec. 1321 is necessarily created under 1311. So, why would they need to point of 1321(c) at this part, if every exchange established under 1321(c) is also deemed to be established under 1311????

It's all unraveling for you, isn't it? I never said they were created identically.

All this winning, by the way, is habit-forming.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Rex

Here, there, and nowhere

Member since Sep 2004

66001 posts

Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:26 pm to MMauler

quote:
I can't wait for the day when you have to start paying for your own damn insurance instead of thinking that other people should pay for it. I just hope that they come after you for all the back premiums that you SHOULD OWE back. Say goodbye to your subsidies you LEECH.

Where'd you get the idea I receive subsidies?

As for your tone, I'll just chuckle about it as I sit this weekend on the beach at our condo.

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board