Started By
Message

re: Big stink over Redksins, they why are Edmonton Eskimos OK?

Posted on 7/25/14 at 11:32 am to
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 11:32 am to
quote:

there are multiple polls with multiple results.


Link them

Also, the study the Redskins poll claimed that it did not vary based on tribe.

quote:

its also not surprising that a group with an opposing view would attack the methodology when they dont like the results.


The organization who ran the survey said it isn't an accurate portrayal.

quote:

regardless of their differences though, blacks and Hispanics basically universally view certain terms as racist and should only be used (if ever) by friends. certainly never in a official or semi official environment.
the same cannot be said about Redskins. it simply cant, no matter how much some white folks want it to be.


So it isn't a racial slur if the entire population doesn't agree with it?

I've already said I don't think that the Redskins should change the name. That doesn't mean it doesn't have a history as a racial slur. Context is important.
This post was edited on 7/25/14 at 11:43 am
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
30922 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

The organization who ran the survey said it isn't an accurate portrayal.

when?
as of last year they were still touting the results

quote:

So it isn't a racial slur if the entire population doesn't agree with it?


how can it be a racial slur if the community "affected" by it cant agree that it is? not only that, we arent talking about being ambivalent to the term - but some reasonably large percentage of the population literally taking pride in the term.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram