re: Faith in "Science" = "man made religion" (Evolution related)

quote:

---

you are still using the same definition for faith in separate context.

faith is belief in the absence or on bad evidence

science belief is based on the best evidence available about any particular topic.

so your use of the term blind faith is just plain wrong. stop doing it.

---

BS!

Since you didn't understand it the first time I said it, I'll say it again.

I said "blind faith" not "faith" for a reason. I used the word "blind" as an intensifier.

"Blind faith" is classifying "faith" to mean "faith without evidence or proof."

The differences between faith & blind faith are simple. Faith is believing in something; with or without any information about whatever that something is. Blind-faith... is lacking in some component(s) of information but still continuing to believe in something

You can have faith that something will occur knowing that the evidence suggests the outcome... but blind-faith is having faith something will occur with no evidence or conflicting evidence against that outcome.

LINK

quote:

---

Scientist dont use blind faith to assume anything about the natural world they endeavor to discover the reasons why...sometimes we just dont know but you cannot make the leap the supernatural just because its intellectually repugnant.

---

When scientists believe something based on absolutely no evidence then that belief is based on blind faith.

Provide me with any evidence that even tends to prove their belief that God does not exist.

If scientists can't then they are hypocrites when they ridicule someone who believes that God exists based on no evidence.