quote:
It is career suicide in the scientific community to come out publically and express doubts about evolution. I just know it is not as well established as some on this board imply. I would be interested to know how many Darwinistic scientists secretly have these doubts

it cracks me up when I see people argue, 'Darwinist scientist with doubt' for two reasons, one, the absolutely monstrous amount of convergent evidence for evolution across multiple related and unrelated science disciplines, and two, the job of a scientist is to prove the other guy WRONG and these doubters simply can't gather a consensus with the alternatives they propose.

They probably number in the hundreds balanced against millions.

Its not career suicide.

They can go work for the 'science' department at the Discovery Institute, the ICR, or even for Ken Ham at the Creation Museum and continue their glorious work in fantasy using their biblical glasses to see thru the devil's work.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by mattloc

Alabama

Member since Sep 2012

4320 posts

Posted on 7/29/14 at 11:30 am to Cruiserhog

I love when these highly speculative posts are thrown out with no concrete evidence to support their conjecture.....my only point is that reasonable people have logical arguments against Darwinian evolution. Scientific consensus is irrelevant...at one time the scientific community believed the world to be flat.

Even some of Darwinisms strongest evidence such as DNA has significant issues, and much of it is being publically veiwed with increasing skepticism in light of ongoing research . For example, the fused chromosome referenced earlier in the thread..... several new studies conclude that it was unlikely that that the fused chromosome resulted in the divergence from a common ancestor due to the deleterious effects of such an event

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board