Started By
Message

re: Harry Reid's nuclear option to appoint Federal judges pays off.

Posted on 7/23/14 at 6:00 pm to
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 6:00 pm to
What part of this definition did you miss?

quote:

quote:

US Code 18031(d)(1) An Exchange shall be a governmental agency or nonprofit entity that is established by a State.



An Exchange under ACA, by its very definition, is established BY a state, whether or not HHS set it up administratively for it.
Posted by fleaux
section 0
Member since Aug 2012
8741 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 6:05 pm to
Right, so if its not established by a state then it isn't an Exchange.....
Posted by FalseProphet
Mecca
Member since Dec 2011
11707 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 8:11 pm to
I'd back off this argument Rex. No court has held that the ACA unambiguously provides for subsidies on the federal exchange. In fact, even those that have upheld it have said that the ambiguity is the hook that allows the IRS to implement the regulations.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99201 posts
Posted on 7/23/14 at 8:13 pm to
Rex...you are fricking retarded.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram