- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Harry Reid's nuclear option to appoint Federal judges pays off.
Posted on 7/23/14 at 5:54 pm to Rex
Posted on 7/23/14 at 5:54 pm to Rex
And that right there, my friends, settles the issue.
Yes, 36b says subsidies are available to exchanges established by a state, but the very definition of "Exchange" embodied in the law is that they ARE established by states. 36b is not at all ambiguous, although it is a tad bit redundant.
/debate
Rex wins again.
Yes, 36b says subsidies are available to exchanges established by a state, but the very definition of "Exchange" embodied in the law is that they ARE established by states. 36b is not at all ambiguous, although it is a tad bit redundant.
/debate
Rex wins again.
Posted on 7/23/14 at 5:55 pm to Rex
So if i cook dinner "for" Rex, it was actually cooked "by" Rex???
This post was edited on 7/23/14 at 5:57 pm
Posted on 7/24/14 at 3:46 am to Rex
quote:
Yes, 36b says subsidies are available to exchanges established by a state, but the very definition of "Exchange" embodied in the law is that they ARE established by states. 36b is not at all ambiguous, although it is a tad bit redundant.
Rex LIES again.
You forgot the part in sec. 36B which says ...
quote:
enrolled in through an Exchange established by the State under section 1311
The Federal Exchange that you signed up for was established under section 1321(c), NOT sec. 1311.
Have you no shame you lying piece of sh!t?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News