- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Falcons sign LB Pat Angerer and WR Jeremy Ebert
Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:32 pm to BlueIndian420
Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:32 pm to BlueIndian420
quote:
70,000 huh that's impressive
1
Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:36 pm to Kafka
Is that an impression of your wife when she sees you on the computer again?
Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:38 pm to BlueIndian420
Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:38 pm to BlueIndian420
Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:40 pm to BlueIndian420
quote:
Falcons
quote:
More Sports Board
Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:40 pm to Kafka
Don't we need to actually discuss football first to use that card? We're three pages deep so far without any. That's pretty bad even for this board.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:44 pm to BlueIndian420
quote:
Don't we need to actually discuss football first to use that card? We're three pages deep so far without any. That's pretty bad even for this board.
Ebert played in five games with Jacksonville last year, making three catches.
Pat Angerer's 4 year career stats: 2.5 sacks, 2 interceptions, and 184 tackles.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:51 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Pat Angerer's 4 year career stats: 2.5 sacks, 2 interceptions, and 184 tackles.
I think he has 327 tackles. He had a pretty good 2011 season if I remember right. I don't think anyone is expecting him to be a pro bowler, but if he stays healthy I think he could be viable addition to the lb corps. I don't really understand the Ebert signing tho. Would have rather got a big body for the o line.
This post was edited on 7/22/14 at 9:01 pm
Posted on 7/22/14 at 9:01 pm to dawgfan24348
Posted on 7/22/14 at 9:03 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:I hated this signing. Hated hated hated hated hated this signing. Hated it. Hated every simpering stupid vacant fan-insulting moment of it. Hated the sensibility that thought anyone would like it. Hated the implied insult to the fans by its belief that anyone would be entertained by it.
Ebert
Posted on 7/22/14 at 9:11 pm to Kafka
quote:
I hated this signing. Hated hated hated hated hated this signing. Hated it. Hated every simpering stupid vacant fan-insulting moment of it. Hated the sensibility that thought anyone would like it. Hated the implied insult to the fans by its belief that anyone would be entertained by it.
Don't take this the wrong way, but are you a woman?
Posted on 7/22/14 at 9:24 pm to Kafka
quote:
quote:
Ebert
I hated this signing. Hated hated hated hated hated this signing. Hated it. Hated every simpering stupid vacant fan-insulting moment of it. Hated the sensibility that thought anyone would like it. Hated the implied insult to the fans by its belief that anyone would be entertained by it.
i get it! I get it!
brilliant
This post was edited on 7/22/14 at 9:25 pm
Posted on 7/22/14 at 9:52 pm to BlueIndian420
quote:
Thoughts?
The Falcons are gonna suck arse.
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:02 pm to CBandits82
quote:
these Saints fans on here take this rivalry way more seriously than I've seen in any sport. They are like vultures waiting to come shite on anything Falcon's related that is posted. No rational conversation regarding NFC South teams is ever found on the MSB, might want to try another board. No one here wants to talk football.
You sound pretty serious yourself there, fella.
Posted on 7/23/14 at 12:11 am to KosmoCramer
Finally someone posted some stats halfway down page 2. I don't think it was even a failcon fan that contributed. Saints are better in the trenches on both lines. Plus, no team plays better on turf than the saints.
Saints own this division and always have.
Saints own this division and always have.
Posted on 7/23/14 at 3:47 am to lwest41
quote:
Finally someone posted some stats halfway down page 2. I don't think it was even a failcon fan that contributed. Saints are better in the trenches on both lines. Plus, no team plays better on turf than the saints.
Saints own this division and always have
Falcons will return back to the mountain top of the NFC South with a healthy squad this year.
I mean this from the bottom of my heart...frick the Saints
Posted on 7/23/14 at 8:00 am to jj06
The feeling is mutual. Can't wait to sweep your asses with that shitty roster.
This post was edited on 7/23/14 at 8:05 am
Posted on 7/23/14 at 8:08 am to BlueIndian420
quote:
70,000 huh that's impressive
not really
Posted on 7/23/14 at 8:08 am to SlowFlowPro
Nice
Posted on 7/23/14 at 9:05 am to lwest41
quote:
Saints own this division and always have.
The Saints have a superbowl victory over the Falcons but to say that they "own the division and always have" is simply not true. Hell since the NFC South became the NFC South, every NFC South team has won the division 3 times.
2002 - Tampa Bay
2003 - Carolina
2004 - Atlanta
2005 - Tampa Bay
2006 - New Orleans
2007 - Tampa Bay
2008 - Carolina
2009 - New Orleans
2010 - Atlanta
2011 - New Orleans
2012 - Atlanta
2013 - Carolina
The Saints haven't "owned" the division, they've been dealing with the NFC parity just like the rest of us. The lone seperating thing is their Superbowl victory.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News