Started By
Message

re: Army Times - Bergdahl's attorney also fought for Army captain in espionage case

Posted on 7/16/14 at 7:29 pm to
Posted by MSCoastTigerGirl
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
35525 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

AR 15-6 investigation



What does this mean, if you don't mind me asking?

Is the military court process much different than civilian (or whatever you call it) court process? I'm really interested in understanding this, if someone is willing to explain.


Eta: I googled AR 15-6 investigation. It pulled up a 38 page kindle document.
This post was edited on 7/16/14 at 7:38 pm
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 7/16/14 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

What does this mean, if you don't mind me asking?


Coastie (may I call you Coastie?), the essential elements of it have been answered by Ole War and Navytiger74. If a commander believes there is a reasonable possibility that a crime has been committed or misconduct has occurred, he/she can appoint an AR 15-6 investigating officer to review the facts and make a recommendation on how to proceed (reprimand, admonishment, non-judicial punishment or a courts martial). This investigation can be informal or informal. Just another tool for use by commander (our entire judicial system is rooted in the role of the commander). This is what Major General Dahl is doing right now in regards to Sergeant Bergdahl.

Keep in mind, a commander is a position, not a rank. There can be two officers of equal rank (e.g. colonels) but based upon duty position, only one of them (the commander) has authority to administer non-judicial punishment and conduct investigations.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram