- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why didn't the Dutch bring on the backup keeper again?
Posted on 7/9/14 at 6:10 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Posted on 7/9/14 at 6:10 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
People will question the keeper decision, but the Dutch only made 2 of their PKs, it wouldn't have mattered who was in goal
Completely irrelevant... Everything changes fluidly throughout. Choices are made as things move along, so you can't assume they would have missed the second one had the other keeper been in goal and stopped one.
1
Posted on 7/9/14 at 8:30 pm to Lsut81
Van Persie was subbed off for Huntelaar in the 96th minute I believe. The alternative option that Van Haal probably should have taken was getting a tired RVP to stay on for the remaining 24 minutes, sub on Krul near the end, and let RVP take the first PK.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News