Started By
Message

re: public ban on the use of tobacco

Posted on 7/9/14 at 11:45 am to
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 11:45 am to
it is anti freedom

it is unconstitutional in terms of forcing private enterprises to comply
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67213 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 11:48 am to
quote:

it is anti freedom

it is unconstitutional in terms of forcing private enterprises to comply


This. I HATE tobacco smoke. My SO is allergic to it, but I would never deny someone their rights as an American to smoke it in public.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 11:48 am to
quote:

it is anti freedom

it is unconstitutional in terms of forcing private enterprises to comply


The deleterious effects of second-hand smoke are very, very well documented. You don't have the right to make me share your habit with you.
Posted by TK421
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
10411 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 11:48 am to
quote:

it is unconstitutional in terms of forcing private enterprises to comply


Are health codes against the constitution as well?
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

it is anti freedom

it is unconstitutional in terms of forcing private enterprises to comply


This.

Statists and their bullshite legislated and forced morality.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram