Started By
Message

re: Company Wants BR to Annex 630 Acres Near L'Auberge

Posted on 7/8/14 at 1:58 pm to
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57343 posts
Posted on 7/8/14 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

Why should they have to?


I don't know, but opponents sure are jumping through a lot of hoops to make sure StG doesn't happen. That part of the parish must be important for something. I'm sure LSURussian will soon chime in to give us the low-down.
This post was edited on 7/8/14 at 2:00 pm
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67212 posts
Posted on 7/8/14 at 2:15 pm to
The city can't annex any areas that would dilute minority voting power or else be subject to the wrath of the federal DOJ. It doesn't matter that the city/parish have a unified government. It is therefore in the city's best interest to incorporate as much unincorporated commercial land as possible into the city while avoiding as much residential land as possible. Remember, in annexation efforts, a majority of the property owners must vote to request annexation in order to be considered by the council. By bypassing residential property owners, those people don't get a say in what gets incorporated. The city government can annex sales tax producing properties and prevent them from ever being able to be used by a hypothetical St. George. It's vindictive, but effective if legal.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126964 posts
Posted on 7/8/14 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

I'm sure LSURussian will soon chime in to give us the low-down.

Nah, you're doing fine on your own.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram