Started By
Message

re: The Republican war on women, George Will's turn

Posted on 7/5/14 at 12:41 pm to
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 7/5/14 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

He wasn't talking about rape in the passage you cited. You are a liar.

The victimhood he was referring to... his entire article... is about rape and alleged rape, you liar.
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 7/5/14 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

The victimhood he was referring to... his entire article... is about rape and alleged rape, you liar.

This is a lie. Here is the passage again.
quote:

They are learning that when they say campus victimizations are ubiquitous (“micro-aggressions,” often not discernible to the untutored eye, are everywhere), and that when they make victimhood a coveted status that confers privileges, victims proliferate.
It is obvious that Will is attributing "victimhood" to that of perceived "micro-aggressions." The fact that those two words are in the same sentence, and the fact that the word "rape" is nowhere near this sentence, supports what you must see as a wild, heretical theory.

"Victims" of "micro-aggressions" proliferate in an environment that confers privilege to people who perceive themselves as victims. This is precisely when a woman has a couple beers with a guy and has sex with him reports it as rape--because it benefits her to do this. If victimhood today did not confer privilege, no woman would ever falsely accuse a man of rape.

You have spun Will's article to fit your narrative, and such spin hurts women, and you are, by the very definition of the word, a misogynist.
This post was edited on 7/5/14 at 12:49 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram