Started By
Message

re: Didn't like the Hobby Lobby decision? Look at the follow up decisions

Posted on 7/5/14 at 12:14 am to
Posted by wfeliciana
Member since Oct 2013
4504 posts
Posted on 7/5/14 at 12:14 am to
quote:

Once they provided exemptions, they didn't help their case.


True. Although I do understand that is was an attempt to accommodate those groups that were truly religious oriented (and non-profit).
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111798 posts
Posted on 7/5/14 at 11:31 am to
quote:

True. Although I do understand that is was an attempt to accommodate those groups that were truly religious oriented (and non-profit).


Non-profit is irrelevant. A non-profit is bound by almost all the rules a for-profit is bound by with the exception of paying taxes. They still comply with discrimination law, OSHA, and other rules, regulations and policies.

Liberals don't like profit and they create a separate category in their mind for for-profits but the distinction is largely artificial.

And a great point was made earlier. Does Gannett Corp not have freedom of the press because they're a corporation? Does Greenpeace lose the right to assemble because they're a corporation? Does the Southern Baptist Convention lose the right to freedom of religion because they're a corporation? Does Clear Channel lose the right to freedom of speech because they're a corporation? Y'all are in a lather about corporations being "given" personhood and rights when they already had it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram