- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:02 pm to efrad
quote:
but this point is really irrelevant
No it's not
quote:
we could be talking about anything
We are talking about birth control, something that HL provided prior to Obama care
quote:
Exempting one company from the law based on their religious beliefs and not exempting all other companies.
Perhaps, these other companies you speak about should file their own lawsuit it they do not like the provisions of the law.
Posted on 7/3/14 at 1:15 pm to efrad
quote:its not OK to exempt some and not others (though Obama has done it again and again), but that is not what the court did. It rule a provision of the mandate unconstitutional, so now the government will have to find other means to institution that provision. That creates no conflict between HL and Michael's, or any other entity for that matter.
Exempting one company from the law based on their religious beliefs and not exempting all other companies... why is that OK?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News