- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The ACLU's disappointing stance on the Hobby Lobby decision
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:50 pm to efrad
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:50 pm to efrad
quote:
But where do we get this idea that employers don't have any obligations whatsoever to their employees?
Perhaps you should be informed that Hobby Lobby provides 16 types of birth control for their employees and has provided these benefits prior to Obama care.
If the employee wants one of the types of BC that Hobby Lobby doesn't provide, they can avail themselves to the exchanges and buy their own policies.
It's simple as that.
2
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:52 pm to ruzil
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/20/21 at 8:42 pm
Posted on 7/3/14 at 9:47 am to ruzil
quote:More or less true. It's a bad deal for the employee and the employer. The employee can go to the exchange but they will not get a subsidy and the employer still gets fined. It would just be easier for the employee to come out of pocket. The pills that are not covered are abortifacient pills. From what I understand you only take them when pregnant. I think they cost 100 bucks or less. A cheap price to pay to rectify a "mistake"
If the employee wants one of the types of BC that Hobby Lobby doesn't provide, they can avail themselves to the exchanges and buy their own policies.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News