- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
4
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:08 pm to efrad
quote:
Why is that acceptable to us? Why is it OK for Hobby Lobby to deny IUD coverage to its employees, but Michael's has to give its employees IUDs?
Agree 100%, I wish this case and ruling were based on an employer's rights to structure a benefits package without government interference...
Posted on 7/3/14 at 6:36 am to efrad
quote:
Person A believes the law violates his religion and is exempt from it.
Person B doesn't like the law but still has to follow it regardless.
Um...Taxes
Churches don't pay them.
I do and don't like it.
Posted on 7/3/14 at 8:31 am to efrad
quote:
Why is that acceptable to us? Why is it OK for Hobby Lobby to deny IUD coverage to its employees, but Michael's has to give its employees IUDs?
Obviously the answer is that the government imposing itself in the employer-employee contractual relationship is unacceptable. The problem is the idea that government gets to regulate the terms of an employment contract, not who gets what exception.
Posted on 7/3/14 at 1:02 pm to efrad
quote:
Person A believes the law violates his religion and is exempt from it. Person B doesn't like the law but still has to follow it regardless.
Welcome to America.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News