- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will the fact Nadal has trouble winning on grass affect his legacy?
Posted on 7/1/14 at 2:20 pm to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 7/1/14 at 2:20 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I am a bit of a Fedtard and really don't like Nadal for a lot of reasons. But, if he gets to 18, even with 10 RG, he is GOAT.
Do you think if a player dominated Wimbledon like Nadal does the French Open that the player would be considered GOAT?
2
Posted on 7/1/14 at 2:22 pm to goldennugget
quote:
Do you think if a player dominated Wimbledon like Nadal does the French Open that the player would be considered GOAT?
Depends on what else he does. But nobody has dominated an event like Rafa has dominated the French.
Posted on 7/1/14 at 2:24 pm to goldennugget
quote:
Do you think if a player dominated Wimbledon like Nadal does the French Open that the player would be considered GOAT?
We value Wimbledon more because of history/prestige/mystique, but grass is a fluky arse surface. Guys like Roddick or Ivanisevic could easily have four Wimbledons if things had broken the right way. Doesn't mean they are all time greats. Wimbledon shouldn't carry that much more value when evaluating greatness. Heck, I think you can argue the hard court tournaments should carry the most weight because it is the most neutral surface.
This post was edited on 7/1/14 at 2:25 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News