Started By
Message

re: Will the fact Nadal has trouble winning on grass affect his legacy?

Posted on 7/1/14 at 2:18 pm to
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
53674 posts
Posted on 7/1/14 at 2:18 pm to
I am a bit of a Fedtard and really don't like Nadal for a lot of reasons. But, if he gets to 18, even with 10 RG, he is GOAT.

Fed has one French Open, nothing on the head-to-head, has lost Aussie and Wimbledon matches to Rafa, lost to young Rafa during Fed's prime, etc, etc. Really, all Fed fans have is that a decent amount of those head-to-heads were on clay and Rafa just didn't advance far enough in some Wimbledons and US Opens to lose to Fed (which is a big assumption to have in the first place).
This post was edited on 7/1/14 at 2:19 pm
Posted by goldennugget
Hating Masks
Member since Jul 2013
24514 posts
Posted on 7/1/14 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

I am a bit of a Fedtard and really don't like Nadal for a lot of reasons. But, if he gets to 18, even with 10 RG, he is GOAT.


Do you think if a player dominated Wimbledon like Nadal does the French Open that the player would be considered GOAT?
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
22817 posts
Posted on 7/1/14 at 2:22 pm to
Well Wasn't Fed clearly #2 on Clay while Fed was dominating the other surfaces?
Posted by kidbourbon
Member since Jul 2009
1306 posts
Posted on 7/1/14 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Rafa just didn't advance far enough in some Wimbledons and US Opens to lose to Fed (which is a big assumption to have in the first place).


Which Wimbledons?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram